Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory12.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 216
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 421
52% 395 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.17 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.5% Very good
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 99.5
Parallax 110
75% 100 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 86.5
86% 108 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1007 879 759 764 890 854 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 1,620
Mixed 1,348
SusWrite 859
287% 1,273 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 40.9
132% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 346
245% 308 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 157%
Great: 337%
Asmt 2115 525GB
386GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 226 235 171 132 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 270
Write 354
Mixed 305
SusWrite 194
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 20.5
68% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 85.5
DQ Write 73
DQ Mixed 108
73% 89 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 124 125 139 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 102
Write 120
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 129
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
215% 2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback