MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 11:26
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 118
53% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 798
62% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.6 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 14.6
11% 13 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG4500G 500GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 715 471 478 477 475 493 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1859
Write 2215
Mixed 1,785
SusWrite 518
358% 1,594 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 57.8
186% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 727
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 817
562% 696 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 193%
Great: 370%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$106
797GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 401 406 409 401 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 393
Mixed 386
SusWrite 404
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 41.9
136% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 212 216 213 213 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 156
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 209
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
244GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 73 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 65.7
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 71.3
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 57%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
39GB free, PID 70f5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 38.1
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 38.9
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 19%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB
1TB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 94.1
Write 94.6
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 90.5
112% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 31.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,151
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback