Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

Performance Results


Gaming 134% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 116% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY325
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '21 at 01:57
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	86%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 68.8 1-Core 129 2-Core 263 82% 154 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 672 72% 574 Pts	64-Core 663 41% 663 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4900 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	168% Outstanding	Lighting 242 Reflection 214 Parallax 280 197% 245 fps	MRender 260 Gravity 202 Splatting 155 162% 206 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 202%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 312GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1441 1554 1485 1129 1140 1136 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	284% Outstanding	Read 2,123 Write 1,119 Mixed 751 SusWrite 1,314 295% 1,327 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 68.9 237% 85.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,157 DQ Write 903 DQ Mixed 971 742% 1,010 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 284% Great: 353%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	MC Read 47.2 MC Write 47.5 MC Mixed 41 129% 45.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 40.1 SC Mixed 29.9 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310 Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0310

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	298x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	163x
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 38%, 3,536 samples	104x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	3x

SSD
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	92x
CA5-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 181%, 1,283 samples	65x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	59x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	242x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16