Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 31 '21 at 21:36
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$101 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 53.8 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 168 57% 103 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 567 51% 429 Pts	64-Core 624 39% 624 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.5% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 157 Parallax 107 90% 125 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 98.6 Splatting 92.9 86% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Reeinno XL120GB M1S3 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 255 245 82 82 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 452 Write 248 Mixed 252 SusWrite 165 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 20.8 96% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 31 58% 113 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 87GB free Firmware: HP63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 88 88 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 86.7 Write 83.9 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 87.9 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 21GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26% Poor	Read 43.8 Write 42.1 Mixed 33.6 SusWrite 46.6 31% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KZ24UE1G08TZH8 Kingston 9905678-105.A00G 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.3% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 26.5 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 19.9 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	332x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	325x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	283x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	225x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16