Asus M32CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus M32CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 183
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 173
38% 253 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 200
Parallax 191
175% 202 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 149
Splatting 133
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 147%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 295 294 179 97 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 423
Write 374
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 190
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 16.3
57% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 0.5
60% 141 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
59GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 132 75 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 436
Write 401
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 114
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 18.6
68% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
800GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 179 185 186 187 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 175
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 182
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Intenso Slim Line 32GB
26GB free, PID 2910
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 11 15 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 34.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 12.3
27% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
25% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 7.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback