Zoostorm 7010-0339B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm 7010-0339B  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte F2A55M-DS2
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 131
57% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 210
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002LIM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 42 43 41 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 6.8
Write 22.9
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 39.7
16% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 77%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
862GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 74 81 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28% Poor
Read 23.9
Write 9.4
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 73.7
22% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 75.B93DE.G040 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback