Gericom U50SA2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 2%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 2.62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGericom U50SA2  (all builds)
MotherboardGericom U50SA2
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 21:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3200
uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Memory 2
1-Core 14.7
2-Core 19.2
6% 12 Pts
4-Core 18.1
8-Core 21.2
2% 19.7 Pts
64-Core 20.9
1% 20.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Elitegroup(1019 2375) 128MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1646GSX 160GB-$35
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB114C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 25 26 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 39
Write 36.2
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 26.1
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.78% Terrible
MC Read 1.6
MC Write 1.4
MC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 485
8% 485 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback