CMS 7200-5703A

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	CMS 7200-5703A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF GAMING B460-PLUS
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	May 30 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 88.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 751 74% 604 Pts	64-Core 1,002 62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8793) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 121 Parallax 104 88% 111 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 96.3 Splatting 93.9 85% 106 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 97%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 406 295 292 295 284 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,472 Write 1,545 Mixed 1,101 SusWrite 382 252% 1,125 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 61.7 208% 78.6 MB/s	DQ Read 870 DQ Write 599 DQ Mixed 752 557% 740 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 237%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.M16FG 2x8GB 341 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.1% Excellent	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 27.1 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 21.6 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5703A Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 73%

Battleship

System: CMS 7200-5703A

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	22x
Core i9-10900Intel $276Bench 94%, 11,130 samples	4x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	16x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	3x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP 2x8GBCrucialBench 86%, 1,331 samples	7x
CT8G4DFRA266.C4FE Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CT8G4DFRA266.C4FE Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GBCrucialBench 82%, 4 samples	4x
CT8G4DFRA266.M16FG 2x8GBCrucialBench 86%, 341 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16