HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1850
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130816
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '21 at 00:45
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 127 49% 84.3 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 209 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.9% Average	Lighting 54.3 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 48.8 44% 52.7 fps	MRender 41.9 Gravity 50.7 Splatting 44.7 38% 45.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 94 97 105 105 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 98.1 Write 106 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 89.4 62% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 68%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB 763 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 50GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 25.1 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 10.9 29% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.6 242% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 22%
ST980815 A 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 36GB free, PID 0272 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 24 24 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.1% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 28.4 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 24.2 35% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
C 2x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	30.6% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 10.7 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

CPU
A8-5500B APUAMDBench 48%, 2,596 samples	158x
A4-5300B APUAMDBench 39%, 2,157 samples	145x
A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)AMDBench 52%, 1,191 samples	60x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	134x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	113x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	42x

SSD
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBHBench 28%, 136 samples	20x
1x4GBHBench 22%, 243 samples	18x
M 1x4GBSBench 21%, 245 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16