Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '21 at 19:53
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 212
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 561
60% 476 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
165% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 228
Parallax 242
186% 233 fps
MRender 282
Gravity 214
Splatting 162
173% 219 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 165%
Great: 202%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 179
Parallax 175
135% 173 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 175
Splatting 123
115% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 495
Write 376
Mixed 370
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 57.8
202% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 349
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
80GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 322 319 317 319 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 474
Mixed 414
SusWrite 326
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 57.3
201% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
353GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 154 142 151 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 173
Mixed 101
SusWrite 151
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $674
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback