| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP300E5X-S04RU |
| Memory | 0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120810 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 28 '21 at 12:15 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
49.4%
Average
|
53% 86.1 Pts
|
21% 156 Pts
|
9% 153 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
3%
Terrible
|
3% 3.7 fps
|
3% 3.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 211 224 210 213 212 MB/s
|
53.8%
Above average
|
48% 212 MB/s
|
78% 26.4 MB/s
|
109% 157 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
217GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 80 80 81 80 81 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
49% 66.6 MB/s
|
115% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
JetFlash Transcend 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.7 4.8 5.3 4.8 4.8 MB/s
|
3.74%
Terrible
|
7% 6.6 MB/s
|
11% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.1%
Poor
|
18% 6.27 GB/s
|
17% 6 GB/s
|
42% 95.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,054 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 348x |
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 151x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 93x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $80 |