Monster TULPAR T7 V13.1.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V13.1.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V13.1.1
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 22:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 163
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 367
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 387
26% 387 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8703) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6647
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 93.1
Parallax 57.2
44% 68.4 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 57.5
46% 58.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$169
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 61 232 228 55 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 604
Write 504
Mixed 451
SusWrite 174
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 24.3
100% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 298
239% 330 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 190%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
155GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 134
Write 124
Mixed 35
SusWrite 96.8
70% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TULPAR T7 V13.1.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V13.1.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback