Microelectronics G900

Performance Results


Gaming 159% UFO	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 179% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Microelectronics G900 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory	53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	14.8 Days
Run Date	May 27 '21 at 20:15
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 155 2-Core 310 102% 186 Pts	4-Core 620 8-Core 1179 107% 899 Pts	64-Core 2,365 146% 2,365 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	152% Outstanding	Lighting 243 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 10.7 198% 89.3 fps	MRender 201 Gravity 1 Splatting 156 99% 119 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 21705000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1785 1455 730 745 750 750 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,639 Write 1,701 Mixed 1,328 SusWrite 1,036 321% 1,426 MB/s	4K Read 53.7 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 64.8 253% 95.1 MB/s	DQ Read 999 DQ Write 794 DQ Mixed 906 675% 900 MB/s
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 283%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 266GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 450 440 452 454 454 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 453 Mixed 455 SusWrite 450 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 89.6 4K Mixed 54.8 180% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 159 162 163 162 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 122 122 121 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 155 Write 144 Mixed 109 SusWrite 121 98% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 98%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 150 151 152 151 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 111 110 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 147 Write 146 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 110 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 313% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 109%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 437GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 111 110 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 131 Write 128 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 110 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD416F82-3200D NMUD416E86-3200D NMUD416F82-3200D NMUD416E86-3200D 64GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	MC Read 76.3 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 39.9 147% 51.6 GB/s	SC Read 30 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 38.1 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 152%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G900 Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 148%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 162%

UFO

System: Microelectronics G900

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	160x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 5700XAMD $170Bench 96%, 15,311 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	100x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	40x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	8x

SSD
WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TBWDCBench 228%, 7,836 samples	138x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	4x

RAM
NMUD416E86-3200D 2x16GBUnknownBench 101%, 3,261 samples	79x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	30x
CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GBCorsairBench 88%, 48,405 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $649

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16