Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 18:56
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 394
51% 387 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 21
16% 20.9 fps
MRender 21
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 18.8
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 49 57 51 31 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 297
Write 64.3
Mixed 157
SusWrite 46.4
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 18.2
115% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 71
DQ Mixed 4.7
29% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
872GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 174 194 200 199 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 188
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 189
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
151GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 56.7
Write 47.6
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 58
65% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 13.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $176
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback