Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M5910 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M5910
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 27 '21 at 10:25
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 83.5 2-Core 159 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 370 42% 331 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.2% Very good	Lighting 90.8 Reflection 113 Parallax 97.1 74% 100 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 91.6 Splatting 97.5 80% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 9.2 9.4 9.1 9.6 149 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.1% Poor	Read 242 Write 222 Mixed 217 SusWrite 32.3 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 11.3 50% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 83.4 DQ Write 29.1 DQ Mixed 0.2 15% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 100%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 78GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 51 51 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 44.3 Write 48.7 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 50.4 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0707 GU512303EP0202 0707 GU512303EP0202 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	39% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.6 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 11.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	68x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	12x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	9x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x
X150 480GBEmtecBench 75%, 1,954 samples	7x

RAM
CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 7 samples	7x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 12GBUnknownBench 35%, 7 samples	6x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $301

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16