Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160531
Uptime	12.6 Days
Run Date	May 27 '21 at 09:32
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 136 63% 101 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 307 36% 278 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 143 Reflection 144 Parallax 144 116% 144 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 129 Splatting 114 114% 143 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,034 Write 1,785 Mixed 2,003 502% 2,274 MB/s	4K Read 183 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 63.3 392% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 334 229% 280 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 60GB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 56GB free Firmware: 502ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 44 41 50 57 56 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.3% Below average	Read 147 Write 66.5 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 47.4 18% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 24.8 92% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 67.3 DQ Mixed 31.9 29% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 80%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 29GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 303 180 133 129 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 391 Write 344 Mixed 304 SusWrite 187 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 40.5 134% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 40.9 DQ Write 89.2 DQ Mixed 53.8 44% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 331GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 163 162 163 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 105 Write 108 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 159 71% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 16GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 41 26 15 14 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 92.7 Write 27 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 26.1 57% 49 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.5 116% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 3,104 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.8% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	155x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	110x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	65x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	24x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	11x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $517

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16