Intel E5 M2L-8D

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	63.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel E5 M2L-8D (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190618
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 25 '21 at 23:58
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,377 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 180 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 682 60% 510 Pts	64-Core 2,150 133% 2,150 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E331) CLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Lighting 83.3 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 130 68% 95.7 fps	MRender 67.4 Gravity 90.5 Splatting 46.3 54% 68.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IND-S325S/512G 512GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200916 SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 379 380 385 387 382 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 473 Write 398 Mixed 354 SusWrite 382 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 12 100% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 18.5 72% 158 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 95%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 764GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 15.7 Write 20.4 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 19.7 15% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.1 49% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 70%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 170GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 87 98 101 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 79.9 Write 21.2 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 96.4 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 16 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 21 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 15.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.2 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E5 M2L-8D Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Intel E5 M2L-8D

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2689 01stBench 66%, 461 samples	12x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	8x

GPU
RX Vega-56AMD $170Bench 78%, 92,053 samples	8x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	7x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	7x

SSD
M.2 PCIe SSD 512GBSpccBench 203%, 29,096 samples	5x
IND-S325S/512G 512GBBench 67%, 64 samples	4x
TOSHIBA 512GBThnsf5512gpukBench 121%, 1,826 samples	4x

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	8x
HMT42GR7MFR4A 2x16GBHynixBench 51%, 50 samples	4x
M393B1K70QB0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 415 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16