| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130927 |
| Uptime | 1.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 25 '21 at 20:52 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.6%
Good
|
60% 100 Pts
|
37% 276 Pts
|
17% 270 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.63%
Terrible
|
0% 0.87 fps
|
1% 1.23 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 80 66 62 60 MB/s
|
21.2%
Poor
|
19% 25.8 MB/s
|
32% 0.33 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD3201ABYS-01B9A0 320GB
201GB free
Firmware: 13.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 59 59 58 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
41% 54.9 MB/s
|
162% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.9%
Below average
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
47% 84.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,035 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 158x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 100x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 78x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 116x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $155 |