Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 42.4 1-Core 57.7 2-Core 108 39% 69.2 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 224 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E50 8003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 256GB 256GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0924A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 329 327 357 315 291 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 340 Write 281 Mixed 300 SusWrite 327 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 13.3 74% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 44.7 80% 155 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 1x8GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 10.9 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	101x
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	1x
Gemini LakeIntelBench 33%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	102x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 1x8GBABCDBench 24%, 109 samples	63x
DDR4 NB 8G 2400 1x8GBUnknownBench 26%, 139 samples	27x
AZ8G4SW266-8G 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 105 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16