Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190712
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 24 '21 at 21:05
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$420 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 152 2-Core 300 101% 183 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 1,157 104% 876 Pts	64-Core 1,603 99% 1,603 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$130 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2089 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Lighting 72.1 Reflection 97.2 Parallax 67.8 59% 79 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 71.5 Splatting 67 56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$56 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 276 273 277 274 271 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1588 Write 1,127 Mixed 559 SusWrite 320 199% 898 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 56.7 220% 82.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,112 DQ Write 958 DQ Mixed 631 583% 900 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 14GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 9,067 Write 9,313 Mixed 9,437 2,076% 9,272 MB/s	4K Read 716 4K Write 289 4K Mixed 399 1,750% 468 MB/s	DQ Read 1,719 DQ Write 1,153 DQ Mixed 1,254 985% 1,375 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$80 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 730GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 185 185 186 186 185 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 131 Write 93.4 Mixed 72 SusWrite 184 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 9,684 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 41.2 MC Mixed 28.3 104% 36.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 48.7 SC Mixed 32.9 99% 34.8 GB/s	Latency 50.5 79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 126%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $50Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	268x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $60Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	206x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $50Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	204x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $60Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	299x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	252x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $43Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	192x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $864

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16