Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 58.2 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 77.6 38% 59.2 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 168 18% 143 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB 8,930 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 280 241 222 206 189 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 710 Write 482 Mixed 388 SusWrite 266 103% 461 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 24.8 83% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 212 167% 236 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 172%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 20.2 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14.9 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	330x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	51x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	213x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 40%, 34,471 samples	93x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	40x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AA 512GBKingstonBench 119%, 4,645 samples	140x
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBBench 132%, 8,930 samples	134x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples	48x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	95x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples	85x
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 2x4GBHynixBench 58%, 4,122 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16