Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory85.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '21 at 12:04
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 167
2-Core 328
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1,173
109% 907 Pts
64-Core 2,236
138% 2,236 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
EVGA(3842 2287) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 181
Reflection 175
Parallax 193
148% 183 fps
Gravity 155
Splatting 131
125% 143 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 1TB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 818 874 868 847 761 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Crucial M550 1TB-$700
175GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 257 260 254 258 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 396
Write 400
Mixed 260
SusWrite 273
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 29.1
103% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 89.1
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 97.7
85% 123 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 109%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
50GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 60 60 61 62 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
ST5000DM000-1FK1 5TB
787GB free
Firmware: CC46
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 910
Mixed 224
120% 567 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 17.9
86% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 18.9
89% 220 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 19%
SABRENT 1TB
585GB free
Firmware: RKT3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1585 531 528 504 501 503 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Toshiba HDWG180 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 166 173 172 168 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 182
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 172
111% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX KHX3200C16D4/32GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX 95GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 32767, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 20.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $914
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback