Biostar TA75M+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar TA75M+ (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110913
Uptime	9.2 Days
Run Date	May 23 '21 at 23:29
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 45.9 2-Core 92.9 46% 71 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 180 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.68% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 12.9 8% 11.7 fps	MRender 14.3 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 11.1 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.68% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07985 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 296 Write 300 Mixed 260 214% 285 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 22.1 3,885% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 56.1 DQ Mixed 27.6 288% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Seagate Portable 2TB 11,289 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 29 Mixed 34 SusWrite 21.8 22% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.7 175% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 68%
Generic External 750GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 37GB free, PID 3960 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 30.9 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 19.1 36% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 39%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB 2,112 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 29GB free, PID 00ed Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.5 8.5 9.6 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 16.1 Mixed 6 SusWrite 9.5 16% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 79% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Kingston HP497157-D88-ELFWG 51264Y133I HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 16GB 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.3% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.3 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 92 44% 92 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TA75M+ Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA75M+

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	3x
A4-3400 APUAMD $80Bench 36%, 2,796 samples	2x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	2x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	1x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	1x
120GB 120GBAfoxBench 63%, 440 samples	1x
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	1x

RAM
16GBAdataBench 49%, 220 samples	1x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 46%, 212 samples	1x
Ares DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 1,522 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $81

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16