Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Memory 34.9 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 46.9 22% 35.2 Pts	4-Core 69.3 8-Core 67.2 9% 68.2 Pts	64-Core 69.8 4% 69.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1022) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 3.5 3% 2.83 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 219 211 211 207 215 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 396 Write 368 Mixed 331 SusWrite 219 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 29.5 99% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 186 141% 191 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB 5,265 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 228 18% 228 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	52x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	39x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	20x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	121x

SSD
CV3-CE128 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 349 samples	9x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	4x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	4x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	30x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	19x
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	13x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16