Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E210MA_E210MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E210MA_E210MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E210MA
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 10:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 36.6
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 117
37% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 57.6
13% 85.1 Pts
64-Core 46.9
3% 46.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1132) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.3
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SDXC Card 64GB
54GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 14 20 21 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.55% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 20.2
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 15.7
26% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.55%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown K4F8E304HB-MGCj 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.64% Terrible
MC Read 1.4
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.3 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E210MA_E210MA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E210MA_E210MA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback