MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7885
Motherboard	MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160525
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '17 at 22:37
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 201 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 618 62% 506 Pts	64-Core 778 48% 778 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Lighting 69 Reflection 68.9 Parallax 62.1 56% 66.7 fps	MRender 73.5 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 55 51% 64 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10832 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1572 (B1) Unknown 90 90 117 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 52 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 349 (F1) Unknown 99 99 46500061849	79.3% Very good	Read 505 Write 349 Mixed 349 89% 401 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 19.2 110% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 39.2 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 18.5 46% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 118%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 93 (03) Spinup time 127 127 38686949868 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2119 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 27 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 27269 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 444 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2166 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2166 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 206159413284 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	85.8% Excellent	Read 153 Write 147 Mixed 114 103% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.48 132% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 82%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 89 (03) Spinup time 125 125 42982441458 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 517 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 43 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 26757 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 448 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 537 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 537 (C2) HDA temperature 139 139 223339216939 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 50 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.8% Above average	Read 94 Write 107 Mixed 90.5 73% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.36 95% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 82%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 87 (03) Spinup time 127 127 38686818793 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1717 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 31 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 21236 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 446 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1736 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1736 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 210454315050 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.2% Very good	Read 136 Write 126 Mixed 94.5 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.46 129% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 82%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 858GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 89 (03) Spinup time 125 125 42982310386 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1748 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 27 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 27324 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 455 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1838 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1838 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 197569478697 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.4% Good	Read 97.1 Write 113 Mixed 83 73% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.31 85% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 82%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 785GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 207 (03) Spinup time 125 125 42982441459 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1726 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 26878 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 446 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1744 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1744 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 197569478696 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 55 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	78.5% Very good	Read 133 Write 140 Mixed 115 97% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.35 101% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 82%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 240GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 86 (03) Spinup time 127 127 38686884332 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1593 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 133 133 27 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 27329 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 453 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1619 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1619 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 219044315175 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49% Average	Read 86.4 Write 84.1 Mixed 70.3 60% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.43 114% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FARG 4x4GB 497 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 41.6 MC Mixed 36.5 110% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 20.9 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	397x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	244x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	53x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	30x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	34x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 9,100 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16