MSI B250M PRO-VDH (MS-7A70)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMSI MS-7A70
MotherboardMSI B250M PRO-VDH (MS-7A70)  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '21 at 03:15
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 229
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 639
66% 522 Pts
64-Core 626
42% 626 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$1,089
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 225
Parallax 150
125% 176 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 193
Splatting 127
149% 153 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 136%
Great: 149%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$90
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 74 80 70 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 460
Write 81
Mixed 128
SusWrite 75.4
40% 186 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 22
97% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 66.7
66% 107 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 120%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
360GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 375 388 391 393 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 383
Write 386
Mixed 370
SusWrite 385
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 28.6
93% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 96.4
DQ Mixed 79.1
73% 115 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$160
67GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 88 90 95 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 56
Write 89.5
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 90.1
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
194% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 91%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$81
268GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 97 97 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 100
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 94.6
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$169
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 152 150 150 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 148
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
197% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 83 83 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 132
Write 82.7
Mixed 77
SusWrite 82.1
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 21.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B250M PRO-VDH (MS-7A70) Builds (Compare 3,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B250M PRO-VDH (MS-7A70) - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $622
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback