Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3010 352 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Memory 43.2 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 43.7 24% 36.4 Pts	4-Core 44.7 8-Core 43.8 6% 44.2 Pts	64-Core 44.7 3% 44.7 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 30C9) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.46% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.46% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB 10,347 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 99 97 95 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 450 Write 319 Mixed 283 SusWrite 116 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 30.6 102% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 99.9 DQ Write 79.2 DQ Mixed 90.5 68% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB 18,713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3010IntelBench 24%, 352 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16