Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 920-$90 998 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 88.3 55% 82.2 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 250 27% 213 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800M 1,209 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 040C) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	3.14% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 1.7 3% 2.73 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 3 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.14% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: XA003R17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 205 204 72 117 114 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.8% Average	Read 228 Write 208 Mixed 201 SusWrite 152 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 16.5 57% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 172 129% 172 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KN2M64-ETB 2x8GB 2,986 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	167x
Quadro FX 1800MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,209 samples	107x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	28x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	24x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	16x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $299

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16