Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500T 9,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 173 60% 108 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 324 35% 279 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 30D0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	4.33% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 7.2 5% 6.8 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.1 2% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.33% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF870400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 42 18 30 43 42 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 190 Write 92.2 Mixed 138 SusWrite 51.7 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 11.9 32% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 79.3 DQ Write 76.8 DQ Mixed 32.7 37% 62.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 55%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 5,745 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 32GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 39 31 31 30 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 104 Write 37.4 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 36.5 57% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2 165% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB M471A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB 1,104 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 20.7 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16