Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 19:12
Run Duration449 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 781
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,657
103% 1,657 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3927 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 216
Parallax 155
130% 177 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 136
Splatting 122
122% 153 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2179 2204 2200 2188 1999 2012 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,653
Write 2183
Mixed 1,418
SusWrite 2,130
470% 2,096 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 76.4
259% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 953
692% 904 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 356%
Great: 393%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 471 469 470 464 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 464
Mixed 430
SusWrite 469
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 53.9
176% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 297
221% 293 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
91GB free
Firmware: CS303226
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,496
Write 2,477
Mixed 1,569
416% 1,847 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 74.1
234% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 970
DQ Mixed 1,053
787% 1048 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 286%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
556GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 145 139 116 145 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 450
Write 334
Mixed 286
SusWrite 138
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 14.8
59% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 29.9
43% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
436GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 0 0 353 368 467 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 3.5
Write 473
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 226
42% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 12.3
64% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 126
108% 156 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
445GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 469 466 467 462 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 470
Mixed 403
SusWrite 467
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 55.7
178% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 357
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 469 466 467 462 467 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 469
Mixed 402
SusWrite 467
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 49.9
169% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
439GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 373 329 329 330 329 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 445
Mixed 352
SusWrite 362
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 53.5
178% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 345
264% 359 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
464GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 480 478 479 480 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 466
Mixed 402
SusWrite 478
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 55.7
183% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 104
Write 129
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 124
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 109 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 76.7
Write 58.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 109
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.2
169% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.7% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 19.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $913
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback