Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130427
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 21 '21 at 16:13
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 163 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 488 47% 389 Pts	64-Core 494 30% 494 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 41.6 Reflection 40 Parallax 37.9 34% 39.8 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 26.9 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 526ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 196 202 180 172 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.2% Above average	Read 193 Write 180 Mixed 200 SusWrite 179 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 29.1 89% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 176 129% 169 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ABA300V 3TB 262 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 853GB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 113 114 115 116 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 115 Write 101 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 114 64% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 158 Write 164 Mixed 32.7 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 77GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 103 103 103 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 108 Write 101 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 103 60% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 857GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 108 122 124 125 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 89 Write 97.2 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 120 69% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 190% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.2% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.5 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16