Asrock HM55-MXM

Performance Results

Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 61%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock HM55-MXM  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 02:30
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 X 940-$292
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 113
57% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 263
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 260
18% 260 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M200X
Dell(1028 15CC) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.1.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 17.3
10% 14.9 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 9.8
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10%
Great: 11%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
32gb SATA3 SSD 32GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: i212000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 79 89 84 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 215
Write 77.6
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 82.5
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 11.6
46% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 16.9
14% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical HM55-MXM Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock HM55-MXM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $192
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $317Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback