Asrock HM55-MXM

Performance Results

Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock HM55-MXM  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '21 at 01:20
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 X 940-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 113
58% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 262
29% 224 Pts
64-Core 262
18% 262 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Device(1B0A 9077) 1,024MB
Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 306.97
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 5
Parallax 0.8
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 2.6
10% 7.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
32gb SATA3 SSD 32GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: i212000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 87 82 73 41 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.8% Poor
Read 233
Write 82.4
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 66.1
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 6.8
28% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 14.1
12% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical HM55-MXM Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock HM55-MXM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $192
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback