Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 23:00
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
84% 144 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 574
63% 486 Pts
64-Core 685
46% 685 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.2
6% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 6%
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5212) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
168% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 223
Parallax 450
180% 298 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 184
Splatting 259
154% 222 fps
Poor: 179%
This bench: 168%
Great: 205%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1646 1324 1372 1458 1320 1481 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1707
Write 1,199
Mixed 736
SusWrite 1,433
284% 1,269 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 72.2
235% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 561
DQ Mixed 821
597% 786 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 263%
Great: 378%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
62GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 94.6
Write 53.7
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 19.3
56% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.1% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 5,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $360Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback