Hp-pavilion FQ565AAR-ABA a6700f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHp-pavilion FQ565AAR-ABA a6700f  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Nettle3
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 21:10
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Phenom 9150e
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 32
2-Core 65.2
32% 48.9 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 132
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 130
9% 130 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 1.4
4% 3.57 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 3.6
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Dis 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 172 161 167 164 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.9% Average
Read 196
Write 183
Mixed 180
SusWrite 165
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 20.9
76% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 29.9
25% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical FQ565AAR-ABA a6700f Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion FQ565AAR-ABA a6700f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $317Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback