Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091202
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	May 19 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 155 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 403 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3755) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 109 Parallax 113 96% 113 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 104 Splatting 94.3 89% 112 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 175 222 224 225 225 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	78% Very good	Read 262 Write 251 Mixed 250 SusWrite 199 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 45.8 149% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 128%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 885GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 148 173 176 174 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 175 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 160 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 108%
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB 3,080 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 581GB free, PID 25fe Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 99 104 103 103 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 123 Write 111 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 99.6 124% 95 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.4 169% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.8% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 13.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H55M-UD2H Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-UD2H

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	53x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	53x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	45x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	78x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	70x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16