Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory50.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 17:31
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$289
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 881
88% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,303
87% 1,303 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$400
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 145
Parallax 191
101% 154 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 135
Splatting 96.2
106% 116 fps
Poor: 95%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 225 187 186 238 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 403
Write 334
Mixed 249
SusWrite 218
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 34.2
110% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 131
117% 178 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 119%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$70
675GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 119 120 118 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 105
Write 82.7
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 119
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 99%
Kingston DataTraveler 160 8GB
7GB free, PID 1646
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.2 5.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 6
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.3
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 28.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 27.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 23,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,136
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback