Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 71.1 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 142 59% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 198 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% PwrHis(1787 2009) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	4.29% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 8 Parallax 3.7 4% 5.6 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 7.1 4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.29% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 108 61 28 75 54 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 225 Write 216 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 74.5 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 22 85% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.8 DQ Write 62.5 DQ Mixed 30 27% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 82%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$60 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 436GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 205 209 218 215 213 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.9% Good	Read 227 Write 220 Mixed 210 SusWrite 210 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 36 126% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 41.5 DQ Write 85.2 DQ Mixed 53.5 44% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 130%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 286GB free Firmware: JP2OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 132 133 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 131 Write 132 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 132 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 14.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16