Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 82.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 271 89% 163 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 877 82% 684 Pts	64-Core 1,095 68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 097E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	4.14% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 8 5% 18.6 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 9.5 Splatting 0.3 2% 3.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.14% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pc611 NVMe SK hynix 512GB 3,469 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11001111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,142 Write 1,319 Mixed 1,144 269% 1202 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 54.2 179% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 371 257% 317 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 273%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB 15,521 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 27.9 92% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 36.3 SC Mixed 26.4 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	738x
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples	177x
Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples	155x

SSD
2300 NVMe 512GBMicronBench 226%, 3,314 samples	74x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc611Bench 194%, 3,469 samples	58x
NVMe SK hynix 1TBPc711Bench 277%, 5,603 samples	56x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	251x
HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 2x16GBUnknownBench 86%, 2,975 samples	159x
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-XN 2x31.5GBUnknownBench 92%, 1,575 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16