Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 09:00
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 252
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 565
67% 519 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 70.8
61% 74.5 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 68.9
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 197 206 195 192 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 981
Write 426
Mixed 385
SusWrite 206
110% 499 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 43.8
153% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 235
248% 405 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 121%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
1GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 484
Write 472
Mixed 399
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 54.9
185% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 348
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
393GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 382 382 384 382 388 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 348
Write 354
Mixed 316
SusWrite 381
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 50.2
171% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 182
155% 227 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 126%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
201GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 73 76 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46% Average
Read 85.6
Write 83.4
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 74.5
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 163 163 162 163 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 128
Write 98.4
Mixed 70
SusWrite 161
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 91%
MAXTOR S TM3500630AS 500GB
334GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18% Very poor
Read 37
Write 41.5
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 37.6
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
835GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.8 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 37
Write 40.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 5
38% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 19%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
859GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 89 88 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 83.6
Write 79.7
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 88.7
107% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 92.4
Write 91.6
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 82.9
113% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 28.5
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,223
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback