Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 05:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 94
2-Core 199
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 372
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 368
25% 368 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1851) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 8.6
5% 10.3 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 0.2
8% 7.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$35
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 185 188 192 185 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.3% Above average
Read 154
Write 93.1
Mixed 187
SusWrite 187
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 16.2
90% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 96.8
91% 140 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 97%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.1 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.9
9% 8.63 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $68
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $277Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback