Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200901
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 18 '21 at 04:49
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 81.7 1-Core 149 2-Core 294 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 853 86% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,092 68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0521) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.4% Above average	Lighting 65 Reflection 63.5 Parallax 88.2 53% 72.2 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 47.3 48% 60.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 52 52 53 52 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 501 Write 442 Mixed 398 SusWrite 85.9 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 44.5 153% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 243 203% 290 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 91%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 29GB free Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 27 12 55 34 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 448 Write 358 Mixed 230 SusWrite 80.2 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 18.5 81% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 47.2 DQ Mixed 33.5 38% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 168GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 122 124 123 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 165 Write 73.3 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 123 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 474GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 181 185 185 185 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 147 Mixed 94.9 SusWrite 184 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.3 254% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB 22,404 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 33.7 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 32.8 79% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	262x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $137Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	202x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	180x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	148x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	44x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	39x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	64x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $385

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)