Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 49.8 1-Core 18.9 2-Core 27.4 24% 32 Pts	4-Core 39.6 8-Core 21.4 4% 30.5 Pts	64-Core 83.3 5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 5173) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.3% Above average	Lighting 62.7 Reflection 85 Parallax 73.8 51% 73.8 fps	MRender 84.1 Gravity 76.8 Splatting 90.7 69% 83.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 887GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 191 222 249 269 360 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50% Above average	Read 265 Write 179 Mixed 226 SusWrite 250 52% 230 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 18 4K Mixed 18.6 59% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 123 94% 126 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6P1 4x8GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16