Asrock B560 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B560 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 03:45
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-11700K-$380
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 56.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 251
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 691
75% 581 Pts
64-Core 1,214
82% 1,214 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 72%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 116 119 131 93 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 423
Write 325
Mixed 254
SusWrite 132
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 11.8
54% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 72.3
DQ Write 73.6
DQ Mixed 34.8
37% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 55%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
395GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 208 181 183 193 210 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 556
Write 175
Mixed 335
SusWrite 200
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 31.3
102% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 271
270% 458 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 276%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
314GB free
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 769 680 721 577 691 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,152
Write 738
Mixed 783
SusWrite 677
187% 838 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 61.8
228% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 193
352% 713 MB/s
Poor: 282%
This bench: 201%
Great: 589%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$86
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 172 184 170 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 19.7
Write 28.2
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 173
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 106%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$86
10GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 170 186 163 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 145
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 172
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 106%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0825
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 137 139 137 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
Read 126
Write 129
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 136
136% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 0.53 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$170
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B560 Pro4 Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B560 Pro4 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $919
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $100G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback