Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	17.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	May 18 '21 at 02:53
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 81.6 1-Core 129 2-Core 248 85% 153 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 664 74% 580 Pts	64-Core 740 46% 740 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	5.23% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 6.9 Parallax 6.3 5% 6.3 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 10.5 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.23% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 11 43 19 68 25 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.5% Very poor	Read 99.5 Write 76.2 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 44 16% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 7 31% 10 MB/s	DQ Read 11.1 DQ Write 57.5 DQ Mixed 35.1 27% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84 9,234 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 350GB free Firmware: ST6OA3BF SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 85 85 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 99.2 Write 106 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 84.7 63% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 63%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 804GB free Firmware: AX002D SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 85 77 74 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 105 Write 101 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 79.7 58% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2666 1x8GB 764 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 11.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,070x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	930x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	278x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	355x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	296x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	299x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	131x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	157x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16