Asus K50IN

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 22%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K50IN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K50IN
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 18:35
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Memory 33.3
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 56.7
22% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 41.9
8-Core 59.3
7% 50.6 Pts
64-Core 53.6
4% 53.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G102M
Asus(1043 19B4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.57 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 98 142 81 104 108 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 144
Write 112
Mixed 131
SusWrite 108
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 8.3
32% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 59.1
DQ Mixed 36.6
30% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.37% Terrible
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 2.5
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.37%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical K50IN Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K50IN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback