Medionpc MS-7012

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.12GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedionpc MS-7012  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7012
Memory1.2 GB free of 4.125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20030929
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 44.8
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 37.6
27% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 38.3
8-Core 41.7
5% 40 Pts
64-Core 45
3% 45 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series
AMD(1002 3000) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.4
1% 0.55 fps
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160021A 160GB-$75
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 27 31 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 40
Write 6.5
Mixed 15
SusWrite 29.4
17% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 31%
SAMSUNG 500GB
394GB free
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 22 22 22 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 65.3
Write 31.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 20.4
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 52%
SAMSUNG 500GB
441GB free
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.8 9.9 9.7 9.9 9.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 69
Write 32.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 10.2
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 52%
SAMSUNG 500GB
88GB free
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.8 9.8 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 52.7
Write 28.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 9.9
22% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
346GB free, PID a208
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 24.2
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 15.8
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
128, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.86% Terrible
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-7012 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Medionpc MS-7012

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback