Medionpc MS-7012

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4.12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.12GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medionpc MS-7012 (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR MS-7012
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4.125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20030929
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 17 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz 6,937 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 44.8 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 33 25% 35.1 Pts	4-Core 31.8 8-Core 34.9 4% 33.3 Pts	64-Core 38.2 2% 38.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series AMD(1002 3000) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.4 1% 0.55 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160021A 160GB-$75 919 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 27 31 35 35 34 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 40 Write 6.5 Mixed 15 SusWrite 29.4 17% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 86% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 31%
SAMSUNG 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 394GB free Firmware: CR10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 22 22 22 21 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 65.3 Write 31.5 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 20.4 29% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 52%
SAMSUNG 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 441GB free Firmware: CR10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.8 9.9 9.7 9.9 9.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 69 Write 32.5 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 10.2 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 52%
SAMSUNG 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 88GB free Firmware: CR10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.8 9.8 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 52.7 Write 28.3 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 9.9 22% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,774 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 346GB free, PID a208 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 24.2 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 15.8 29% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 128, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medionpc MS-7012

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)