Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z2 SFF G4 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8456
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 141 2-Core 276 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 530 8-Core 832 84% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,083 67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.4% Average	Lighting 50.7 Reflection 55.7 Parallax 50.7 41% 52.4 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 46 Splatting 44.5 42% 52 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 46%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8456) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 8.3 5% 8.17 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 11.8 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB 3,384 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD71HAQ Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 222 215 210 207 207 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 1,198 Write 959 Mixed 772 SusWrite 236 176% 791 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 78.2 263% 91.7 MB/s	DQ Read 976 DQ Write 909 DQ Mixed 1,005 737% 963 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 262%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 145GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,803 Write 7,148 Mixed 7,194 1,648% 7,382 MB/s	4K Read 764 4K Write 307 4K Mixed 383 1,811% 485 MB/s	DQ Read 1,555 DQ Write 1,015 DQ Mixed 1,070 856% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 383GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 478 460 476 468 462 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 451 Mixed 400 SusWrite 469 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 56.1 186% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 354 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 22.7 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 27 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	75x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples	70x
Quadro P620NvidiaBench 18%, 6,548 samples	58x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	47x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H2 256GBSamsungBench 204%, 754 samples	31x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	14x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	28x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	15x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 78%, 6,317 samples	14x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16