Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175 12,658 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 118 50% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 206 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 15.7 9% 12.7 fps	MRender 9.2 Gravity 12.4 Splatting 10.1 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 17 19 29 15 22 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.2% Average	Read 256 Write 136 Mixed 179 SusWrite 46.8 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 26.1 97% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 103 88% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 18.8 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 11.2 25% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 2.6 196% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.5 2.8 3.6 3.2 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	9.12% Terrible	Read 26.6 Write 6.8 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.2 10% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.2 129% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.12% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GB 1,987 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.4% Below average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 16.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	21x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	17x
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	11x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	18x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	12x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16